1.0 Introduction and Problem Statement

It is believed by many that the governments and worldwide organizations like United Nations (UN) are the confidants of all respective nations worldwide. On a plain table, the UN is believed to be an independent body serving the rights and welfare of the global civilians. Under it are many bodies, agencies and authorities where they all revolve around the same core mission of protecting and bettering the welfare of the human society at large. World Health Organization; WHO, is one of those branches of UN. Its main objective is to act as the directing and co-coordinating authority on international health work and assisting Governments, upon request, in strengthening health services by furnishing appropriate technical assistance and necessary aid in emergencies. But in a nutshell, is it really true? Do they practice what they preach?

What really steered me in raising this question was the mystery behind the once global fuss which was amplified across various nations and news main streams about its deadly welfare – the H1N1 virus. As much as the WHO; World Health Organization, tried to cough out explanations about the pandemic virus, more and more scientists, health researches and even journalists started raising questions about the organization’s motives and its agendas. It also forced me in believing that governments had something to do with this hype. Why do I claim so? This is due to the fact that a viral influenza disease spanning from three continents having in it the elements of bird, swine and human flu is considerably speculative that the origin of it has got to be man-made.

Technically, it is possible. The US military itself has the know-how on how to engineer and release such a virus. I am not concluding that they did so, but nevertheless I am not on the refuting side either. Governments of the world have routinely engaged in crimes against humanity, have they not? The U.S., for example, dropped nuclear bombs on civilian populations in Japan. Israel rained white phosphorous on Palestinians, Hitler exterminated countless Jews, and Americans fired millions of depleted uranium rounds into targets in Iraq and Afghanistan. Unleashing a viral biological weapon in Mexico City is no great leap beyond what governments have already done to achieve their goals. But all in all, who benefits from such a hype created in the public welfare and their sufferings? Was it for real, or just a pack of conspiracy and hoax…

2.0 Arguments and Findings

2.0.1. Argument 1:                                                                        

My first argument revolves around the obliviousness of the nature of this pandemic virus and its nature of scam laced in. It took me further to look into figures on report analysis given by WHO about influenza data. So far, more than 3.5 million people were reported to be infected with swine flu worldwide. More than 9,000 deaths were confirmed positive. In comparison, every year, up to one billion people get infected with seasonal flu with up to 500,000 deaths. Utterly surprising, WHO never make headline news about it. On June 11 2009, the WHO declared swine flu a pandemic. Why is this so?

As the panic attack spread, people rushed to clinics for Tamiflu – which cost $145 a pop and by prescription only in the US – and for vaccinations, which range anywhere from $10 to $50. In spite of many having had lost their jobs in the 2009 financial crisis, and were left without health insurance, vaccinations and pharmaceutical sales like Roche and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) plummeted. Nobody wants to die a gruesome death from the supposedly new virus. As a result, the chief health care organization in the world teamed up with the drug makers to create a phantom monster and to rake in cash by selling a remedy for it. In order to achieve all this, it was plastered everywhere on news headlines and newspaper front pages that a catastrophic inferno was about to wipe out humanity unless preventive measures are taken into consideration. The only way out is buying the vaccines for the influenza.

According to Science Progress 2011, they believe based on their article they published that vaccine is not the only way out as Vitamin D has been proven scientifically to be effective at preventing influenza than vaccines. This clearly inclines that the WHO and its scientists, who are believed to be independent of thought and job definition appear on pharmaceuticals’ payrolls. This is because WHO hurriedly declared the status of global pandemic when only a few thousand people were infected with it – something that is highly illogical considering the hundred thousand more cases of seasonal flu never get paid with such high attention. The virus was reported to be extremely deadly but when parallels are to be drawn to the Spanish Flu, which killed roughly 50 million people worldwide in the span of six months one will realize the mediocre.

2.0.2. Argument 2

My second argument is established at the independence notion of respected global bodies like UN and Multi Billionaires who call themselves “philanthropists”. It is scrupulously beyond any doubt that there was a third party involved in driving this pandemic fraud a milestone ahead. Reported by Deborah Cohen; BMJ features editor and a journalist; Philip Cater, they authored that there was a financial conflict of interest in the execution of WHO research. Top scientists urged WHO to publicly declare a pandemic break out of H1N1 virus globally whom they knew had close financial ties with the vaccine companies. The WHO secretary general Dr Margaret Chan defended the so-called secrecy in order to protect the independence and integrity of its members while doing its work. To me this is ridiculous, saying that WHO was keeping the financial ties a secret in order to “protect the integrity” of the members is like saying we are all serving alcohol at tonight’s AA (Alcoholics Anonymous) meeting in order to keep everybody off the bottle. It is obvious to anyone who knows just how corrupt the sick-care industry really is. They will do practically anything to make more money, including bribing WHO scientific advisors and paying them kickbacks once the vaccines surges up.

As I went on with my research, I got more engraved with the conniving articulation between WHO and the mighty pharmaceuticals companies. I quite felt that there is much more to this picture that what I could see as at that moment. It was then I realized that another party was involved in this global pandemic where they were purely beneficiaries, the billionaire philanthropists. Financiers like Bill Gates, David Rockefeller Jr., Warren Buffett and George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York, and the media hit entrepreneurs like Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey were the beneficiaries behind this looming global disaster. Based from an article from Euro Med 2013, it states that with them as money lords financing the vaccines and airing massive propaganda on media in buying vaccines against the unusual benign swine flu.

All these individuals had their respective role plays in protracting this pandemonium in utmost fear of exaggeration. Most of them have shares is pharmaceutical firms and thus addressing this as a global catastrophe on the verge to wipe out mankind and arming in campaigns to civilians all over the world to buy vaccines, is the only lucrative and easiest way to earn billions. Where did the platform of securing the welfare for of general public go to?

2.0.3. Argument 3

Finally, my last argument is all about why is it that no actions were taken for general public disharmony? According to Aleksander Saversky (Russian Politics, 2009) he opinions that it is considered a crime to vaccinate people with swine flu vaccine on a seasonal flu outbreak. This is due to the fact that the patients will have to battle two viruses at the same time and this will put deep strain on the immune system. The strains of the H1N1 viruses were laboratory cooked up and then vaccines were made to back them up. This was put on evident when one pharmaceutical company was seen injecting live swine flu viruses into the vaccines before sending them to various eighteen countries (NaturalNews,2009). Many of the big pharmaceuticals used this strategy in bearing their conspiracy a milestone ahead.

But years later after the fracas had subsided, many of the swine flu vaccinated victims have been left with so much health problems. For example, Emelia is among many in Sweden and elsewhere who suffer from narcolepsy – an incurable sleeping disorder – after having been immunized against the H1N1 virus, a vaccine made by GlaxoSmithKline in 2009 (Reuters, 2013). The vaccine itself had an element known as Squalene which causes incurable sleeping disorder and sometimes paralysis in the long run. In total, the GSK shot was given to more than 30 million people in 47 countries during the 2009-2010 H1N1 swine flu pandemic, the real question was it really worth it?

The answer is no. While estimates vary, Dr Goran Stiernstedt says Sweden’s mass vaccination saved between 30 and 60 people from swine flu death. Yet from the time the pandemic ended, more than 200 cases of narcolepsy have been reported in Sweden. With retrospection, this risk-benefit balance is unacceptable. Emily needs an expensive cocktail of drugs to try to control the narcolepsy symptoms. The stimulant Ritalin and the sleeping pill Sobril are prescribed for Emelie’s daytime sleepiness and night terrors. Then there is Prozac to try to stabilize her and limit her cataplexies. All these medications are very costly – pocket deep expensive and can only be gotten from big pharmaceutical suppliers like GSK and Big Pharma. That is just expenditure from one Emily, what of the thousands and thousands of Emily across the globe? All the chain of profit-tax injection stretches not only to the firms but also those “money lords” and WHO shareholders, a lifetime and unending gain from the pockets of the victimized innocents.

3.0 Conclusion

From the very origin of the initial raise of alarm about the global pandemic break out, it sounds pretty ludicrous and incomprehensible. There was an agenda to be achieved at the expense of civilians globally and they managed to achieve this perfectly because of asymmetrical information. It is just irresponsible to suggest that some sort of conspiracy led WHO to pull the wool over the world’s eyes and have everyone get vaccinated to line the pockets of their pharmaceutical puppet-masters. The WHO cannot make anyone do anything. It has no power to enforce any mandate or requirements about vaccines or anything else. It relies completely on persuasion. Without the cooperation of individual world governments or rather the so-called “money lords”, medical societies, and public health agencies the WHO can get nothing done. All these entities, including the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, would have to be in the pocket of big pharms to impose a worldwide vaccination plan.

Their plan was well executed. Firstly they exaggerated the risk, secondly WHO urged countries to stock pile, thirdly they started collecting cash till the very present, fourthly those conniving with them in this unethical strategy got their kickbacks and finally WHO kept on keeping people with fears by flaming that H1N1 was so seriously dangerous. Is this the free and independent WHO body we look forward into putting our lives and let our health welfare revolve wholly around at? Are these the philanthropic people whom we air about taking in applause about them creating harmony in the world and alleviating global hardship when they are biting us from the back and empathizing with us at the same time?

Clearly, there is lost hope and trust from me from these entities much more now that I have been fully awakened that all this was just a conspiracy to benefit a few and a hoax to protract fear for their personal benefits. A hoax or conspiracy which ever you name it, it all started in the labs where scientists mixed viral ingredients from birds, swine and humans and later on traversed it out from their labs to cause a haze – a financial pocketful haze!


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

1.1 Introduction Westernization is defined as a process whereby societies come under or adapt to the Western culture. The adoption is done in many aspects as in industry, technology, medicine, politic

The United Nation (UN) is an organisation created in 1945 to promote international cooperation on all aspect of social and economic development. Its objectives include maintaining international peace

Introduction Millions of children in many parts of the world, children are working to feed their families today. Most of the time their jobs are harmful and repressive. Almost 40-50 percent of those c